Left-Sided Pneumothorax in a Potential Kidney Transplant Recipient-A Surprise in the Surgical Ward: Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The risk of morbidity and mortality in the group of people qualified for kidney transplantation is high. Although currently, the qualification for kidney transplantation is very extensive and detailed, the final examination and assessment at the transplant center is crucial for the success of the transplantation. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease was admitted to the Department of General, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery on July 21, 2023, for kidney transplantation. A month earlier, she had undergone surgery to create an arteriovenous fistula on the left forearm. The regional anesthesia was performed. Apart from temporary pain and cough, the postoperative course was uncomplicated. Upon admission to the Department, the patient was in good general condition, and only a dry cough was noted during the physical examination. Chest X-ray revealed pneumothorax on the left side with partial lung atelectasis. The patient was temporarily disqualified from kidney transplantation and the pneumothorax was cured. She is currently on the active list waiting for a kidney transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the above case emphasizes the importance of a physical examination and final qualification at the transplant center. Detailed examination and evaluation at the above center can improve patients' quality of life and survival.

The Clock Drawing Task reveals executive dysfunction in the dialysis population - an underrecognized and underestimated problem.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aimed to assess the prevalence of executive function impairment among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis, with no subjective cognitive problems and with normal global cognition on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We also investigated the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive test results. RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY: Patients with CKD, including those undergoing renal replacement therapy, are at a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment (CI) than the general population. Recent research has shown CI to be a growing problem among CKD patients worldwide. Yet, it remains underdiagnosed, even though it may significantly influence the lives of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional, prospective study, 58 dialysis patients with no cognitive decline on the MMSE screening were assessed for executive function impairment using the Executive Clock-Drawing Task (CLOX). Moreover, past medical history, demographic data, and laboratory test results were collected. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 59.47 ± 14.98 years, and the mean duration of dialysis was 45.93 ± 48.49 months. The prevalence of executive function impairment amounted to 8.6%. Moreover, remarkably similar pattern of clock drawing was observed, with numbers written outside the clock face in the CLOX1 test. CONCLUSIONS: Executive dysfunctions in dialysis patients may manifest itself before the onset of global cognitive impairment. There appear to be a deficit in the spatial domain as well. Better education may play a protective role.

Green Dialysis: Let Us Talk about Dialysis Fluid.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis is one of the most resources consuming medical intervention. Due to its concept, the proper amount of dialysis fluid passed through dialyzer is crucial to obtain the expected outcomes. The most frequent source of dialysis fluid is production from liquid concentrate (delivered in containers or plastic bags) in dialysis machine. Alternatively, concentrates for dialysis may be produced in dialysis center by dilution in mixing devices dry or semidry premixed compounds connected with system of central dialysis fluid delivery system. Dialysate consumption depends on various factors like type of hemodialysis machine, session duration, prescribed flow, etc. Summary: Modern hemodialysis machines are equipped with the modules which automatically reduce flow rate of dialysis fluid to the patient blood flow and minimize dialysate consumption during preparation and after reinfusion. Smart using of available options offered by manufacturers allows to save additional portion of acid concentrate and water. The weight of concentrates to be delivered to the dialysis center is the major factor influencing the cost (financial and environmental) of transportation from the manufacturer to the final consumer. The crisis on the energy carriers market and extremely high fuel prices made the transportation cost one of the significant costs of the treatment, which must be bear by supplier and finally influence on the price of goods. KEY MESSAGES: The careful choice of the concentrate delivery system can improve cost-effectiveness of dialysis. Such solutions implemented in dialysis unit helps make significant savings and decrease the impact on natural environment by carbon footprint reduction.

Patterns of Cognitive Impairment in Hemodialysis Patients and Related Factors including Depression and Anxiety.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis patients are at higher risk of developing cognitive impairment, but the pattern of affected cognitive domains is still undetermined. Little is also known about the symptoms of depression and anxiety in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 74 consecutive adult patients undergoing hemodialysis. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Addenbrooke Cognitive Test III. In addition, all patients were screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: The mean age of hemodialysis patients was 65.69 ± 14 years. Among the patients, there were 27% and 31% of patients with mild cognitive impairment and suspected dementia, respectively. In the group of patients with suspected dementia, all cognitive functions had significantly lower values compared to these functions in incognitively unimpaired and mild cognitive impairment patients. The most impaired domain was verbal fluency, which reflects impairments in executive function. Depression and anxiety symptoms were observed in 28% and 22% of patients, respectively. Patients with anxiety symptoms had higher levels of endogenous creatinine, parathyroid hormone, and hemoglobin, as well as decreased creatinine clearance, being younger and less educated. No factors contributing to the occurrence of depressive symptoms were found. CONCLUSION: Cognitive dysfunction is a significant problem in hemodialysis patients. Our study showed that the prevalence of cognitive impairment and depression and anxiety symptoms in hemodialysis patients was high. The domain of executive functions was most affected. Furthermore, creatinine, parathyroid hormone, hemoglobin levels, creatinine clearance, and education affected the anxiety scale score.

Vaccination and COVID-19 in Polish Dialysis Patients: Results from the European Clinical Dialysis Database.

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis are particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19 as a result of older age and multimorbidities. Objectives: Data are still limited and there are no published data on mortality in hemodialyzed patients in Poland, in particular when vaccines became available. We assessed the epidemiologic and clinical data of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and assessed the mortality in 2019, 2020, and 2021, as well as the vaccination rate in 2021. Patients and Methods: Retrospectively collected data from 73 Fresenius Nephrocare Poland hemodialysis centers and one public unit were analyzed. Results: In 2021, the vaccination rate was 96%. The unadjusted mortality (number of deaths divided by number of patients) in 2019 was 18.8%, while the unadjusted (after exclusion of COVID-related deaths) mortality in 2020 was 20.8%, and mortality in 2021 was 16.22%. The prevalence of cardiovascular deaths in 2019 and 2020 was almost identical (41.4% vs. 41.2%, respectively), and in 2021, the figures increased slightly to 44.1%. The prevalence of sudden cardiac deaths in 2019 was higher than in 2020 (19.6% vs. 17.3%, respectively) and consequently decreased in 2021 (10.0%), as well as strokes (6.2% vs. 5.4%, and 3.31% in 2021), whereas deaths due to gastrointestinal tract diseases were lower (2.5% vs. 3.2%, and 2.25% in 2021), diabetes complications (0.5% vs. 1.3%, and 0.5% in 2021), sepsis (5.1% vs. 6.3%, and 8.79% in 2021), respiratory failure (1.2 vs. 1.6%, and 2.83% in 2021), and pneumonia (1.4% vs. 2.0%, and 0.82%). There were 1493 hemodialyzed COVID-19 positive patients, and among them, 191 died in 2020 (12.79%). In 2021, there were 1224 COVID-19 positive patients and 260 died (21.24%). The mortality of COVID-19 positive dialyzed patients contributed 13.39% in 2020 and 16.21% in 2021 of all recorded deaths. Conclusions: The mortality among HD patients was higher in 2021 than in 2020 and 2019, despite the very high vaccination rate of up to 96%. The higher non-COVID-19 mortality may be due to the limited possibility of hospitalization and dedicated care during the pandemic. This information is extremely important in order to develop methods to protect this highly vulnerable patient group. Prevention plays a key role; other measures are essential in the mitigation and spread of COVID-19 in HD centers.

Main Barriers to the Introduction of a Home Haemodialysis Programme in Poland: A Review of the Challenges for Implementation and Criteria for a Successful Programme.

INTRODUCTION: Home dialysis in Poland is restricted to the peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality, with the majority of dialysis patients treated using in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD). Home haemodialysis (HHD) is an additional home therapy to PD and provides an attractive alternative to ICHD that combines dialysis with social distancing; eliminates transportation needs; and offers clinical, economic, and quality of life benefits. However, HHD is not currently provided in Poland. This review was performed to provide an overview of the main barriers to the introduction of a HHD programme in Poland. MAIN FINDINGS: The main high-level barrier to introducing HHD in Poland is the absence of specific health legislation required for clinician prescribing of HHD. Other barriers to overcome include clear definition of reimbursement, patient training and education (including infrastructure and experienced personnel), organisation of logistics, and management of complications. Partnering with a large care network for HHD represents an alternative option to payers for the provision of a new HHD service. This may reduce some of the barriers which need to be overcome when compared with the creation of a new HHD service and its supporting network due to the pre-existing infrastructure, processes, and staff of a large care network. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of HHD is not solely about the provision of home treatment, but also the organisation and definition of a range of support services that are required to deliver the service. HHD should be viewed as an additional, complementary option to existing dialysis modalities which enables choice of modality best suited to a patient's needs.

Lack or insufficient predialysis nephrology care worsens the outcomes in dialyzed patients - call for action.

The phenomenon of patients with advanced renal failure accepted for dialysis at a late stage in the disease process (late referral [LR]) is known almost from the beginning of dialysis therapy. It may also be associated with worse outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of referral time on the outcomes, such as number of hospitalizations, length of stay, kidney transplantation, and mortality. A study of 1303 patients with end-stage renal failure admitted for dialysis in the same period in Fresenius Nephrocare Poland dialysis centers was initiated. The type of vascular access during the first dialysis was accepted as the criterion differentiating LR (n = 457 with acute catheter) from early referral (ER; n = 846). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of death during the 13-month observation. By the end of observation, 341 (26.2%) of patients died. The frequency of death was 18.1 for ER and 37.9 for LR per 1000 patient-months. It can be estimated that 52.1% (95% CI: 40.5-61.5%) of the 341 deaths were caused by belonging to the LR group. Patients from LR group had longer hospitalizations, more malignancies, lower rate of vascular access in the form of a-v fistula, higher comorbidity index. It seems that establishing a nephrological registry would help to improve the organization of care for patients with kidney disease, particularly in the pandemic era.

Intraoperative dialysis with the use of a mobile dialysis system during liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: Over the last few years, transplant centers have started to use various intraoperative renal replacement therapy (ioRRT) modalities during liver transplantation (LT) in patients with pre-existing renal impairment. Here, we present a study on the safety and clinical outcomes of intraoperative hemodialysis (ioHD) performed using a mobile dialysis system during LT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 adult patients undergoing LT with ioHD; pre-existing renal failure and/or intraoperative metabolic derangement were ioHD treatment indications. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of three groups: LT with preoperative serum creatinine (sCr) â€‹< â€‹2 â€‹mg/dL (Group 1:n â€‹= â€‹22), LT with preoperative sCr ≥2 â€‹mg/dL (Group 2:n â€‹= â€‹73), and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (Group 3:n â€‹= â€‹7). Among the procedures, 30% were re-transplantations. The mean calculated Model for End-stage Liver Disease score in Group 2 was 39.2, and 67% of patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Patients in Group 1 were less acutely ill but developed severe intraoperative derangements and, therefore, underwent urgent ioHD intraoperatively. However, it was delayed when compared to Group 2. All groups achieved post-reperfusion potassium levels <4 â€‹mmol/L and a decrease in central venous pressure. No serious procedural complications occurred. Post-reperfusion syndrome occurred in 12.7% of patients. Elevated mortality was likely due to the high illness severity in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Performing ioHD with a mobile dialysis system during LT was safe and effective, while being easier to perform than continuous techniques. Its effect on intra- and postoperative outcomes should be addressed in a study with a control group.

Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation and the Use of Intraoperative Dialysis: A Monocenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous liver and kidney transplants (SLKT) represent 1.1% of all liver transplants in Poland. Patients undergoing SLKT experience a longer operation time and concurrent kidney dysfunction may aggravate metabolic derangement associated with the procedure. The benefits of intraoperative dialysis (ioHD) in these patients have not been determined. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all adult patients undergoing SLKT in our center from January 2009 till December 2016. RESULTS: Study group consisted of 10 patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (0.9% of all liver transplants): 6 patients treated with ioHD during SLKT (group 1) and 4 patients managed conservatively (group 2). All recipients were on chronic dialysis. The mean calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 21 ± 0.9 in group 1 and 30 ± 9.5 in group 2 (P = .009). The mean preoperative serum potassium was 4.7 ± 0,6 mmol/L in group 1 and 3.97 ± 1,02 in group 2. Intraoperative serum potassium levels were comparable between the groups, but the maximum lactate and minimum bicarbonate levels were significantly worse in group 2. Postreperfusion syndrome occurred in no patient. Dialysis circuit clotting occurred in 50% of ioHD. Six patients (2 in group 1) required renal replacement therapy after SLKT; no patient was on dialysis on discharge. Three patients died within 1 year after surgery (2 in group 2). CONCLUSIONS: No patient developed intraoperative hyperkalemia or postreperfusion syndrome. We observed a high frequency of circuit system clotting during ioHD. Clinical benefits of intraoperative hemodialysis during SLKT need to be determined in a larger study.

Malignancy Prevalence in the Dialyzed Population and in Waitlisted Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Malignancy is the second cause of death in the dialyzed population. However, data on the prevalence of cancer are very scarce. Kidney transplantation improves quality of life, prolongs survival, and is cost-effective but bears some serious complications including malignancy. Therefore, active screening for cancer is of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of malignancy in dialyzed patients in relation to status on the on the waiting list and type of dialysis. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 108 hemodialyzed patients (mean age 65 years, 47 women) and 47 peritoneally dialyzed patients (mean age 51 years, 25 women). Among the population studied, 20 patients were actively waitlisted, including 14 peritoneal dialysis patients. Patients who had been active on the cadaver kidney waiting list and not listed did not differ in regard to sex, dialysis vintage, and causes of end-stage renal failure, but were significantly younger. Among hemodialysis patients, 24 of them had a history of malignancy and 10 in the peritoneal dialysis population. The most common were renal cell carcinoma in 6, breast cancer in 4, lung cancer in 3, prostate cancer in 3, hepatocellular cancer in 2, colorectal cancer in 2, esophageal cancer in 2, and others 14. In waitlisted patients, only 2 hemodialysis patients had a history of malignancy. Waitlisted patients represent a very selected and healthier dialyzed population. Malignancy has become a more common comorbidity in dialyzed patients, which may have important clinical implication regarding therapy. Guidelines for cancer screening in potential transplant recipients should be developed, as nowadays there are scarcity of data in this matter.

Kidney Transplant Recipients Have Higher Malignancy Prevalence Than Hemodialyzed Patients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant is the preferred therapy for end-stage kidney disease; however, it has been associated with some serious complications, including malignancy, which became the second leading cause of death among kidney allograft recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of malignancy in hemodialyzed patients and in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 114 prevalent hemodialyzed patients, including 7 on the waiting list and 350 kidney allograft recipients. Hemodialyzed patients and kidney allograft recipients did not differ in regard to sex, dialysis vintage, and cause of end-stage renal failure, but were significantly older. RESULTS: Among wait-listed patients, only 1 had a history of malignancy (gastric cancer stage G1). Among kidney allograft recipients, in 70 patients, malignancy developed (in total 20% of the studied population). The leading malignancy was skin cancer (18 cases), followed by post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in 10 cases, lung cancer (small cell and non-small cell lung cancer; 4 cases), renal cell carcinoma (3 cases), brain cancer (glioma; 3 cases), colorectal cancer (3 cases), Kaposi sarcoma (2 cases), Merkel carcinoma (2 cases), metastatic disease of unknown origin (2 cases), and other 23 malignancies were in a single patient (including 1 leukemia and 1 multiple myeloma). Twenty-six deaths were recorded in kidney allograft recipients with malignancy, mainly in PTLD, Kaposi sarcoma, Merkel carcinoma, sarcoma, glioma, and melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower prevalence of malignancy on hemodialyzed population, cancer screening in both potential transplant recipients and kidney allograft recipients is a prerequisite, because nowadays there is a scarcity of data in this area. It may be due to previous immunosuppression, long-term dialysis vintage, immunocompromised status, and immunosuppressive therapy after transplant, in particular in high-risk patients.

Influence of formalized Predialysis Education Program (fPEP) on the chosen and definitive renal replacement therapy option.

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) should play an active role in the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) option. However, patients' knowledge about CKD and treatment options is limited. The implementation of structured education program and shared decision-making may result in a better preparation to RRT, more balanced choice of dialysis modalities and better access to kidney transplantation (TX). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this long-term study was to assess the impact of formalized Predialysis Education Program (fPEP) on knowlege on RRT options, as well as on selected and definitive therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 435 patients (53% men, mean age 60 years) with CKD stage 4 and 5, participating in fPEP at our center. The program included at least 3 visits, during which balanced information about all RRT options was presented and self-care and informed decision-making were encouraged. The knowledge about RRT options before and after fPEP attendance, and selected and definitive RRT options were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of patients received prior nephrology care. After fPEP completion, in most patients, the knowledge about CKD and RRT options and selected preferred modality improved - 40% of participants chose hemodialysis (HD), 32% peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18% TX. During the observation period, 4% of patients died before commencement of dialysis, 2.7% received preemptive kidney transplant, 8.6% were placed on transplant waiting list, and 94% started dialysis (30% PD and 70% HD). Among those who chose PD, 69% started PD and 24% started HD; the leading causes of the discrepancy between choosing and receiving PD was the deterioration in clinical condition (50%) and change of decision (32%). CONCLUSIONS: The fPEP increases CKD patients' knowledge on RRT methods. The implementation of a decision-making process based on fPEP leads to a satisfying distribution between modalities, with a good concordance between chosen and definitive modality.

Underdiagnosis of Major Depressive Episodes in Hemodialysis Patients: The Need for Screening and Patient Education.

This article aims to identify the reasons why patients with major depressive episode (MDE) do not seek treatment for their mental disorder. 89 out of 208 persons screened were diagnosed with major depressive episode using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. 85 individuals with untreated depression filled out the following questionnaires: Beck Depression Inventory, List of Explanations of Well-Being (LEWB), Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Course of the Disease, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Brief Method of Evaluating Coping with Disease, and Metacognitions Questionnaire. There were 43 women (50.6%) and 42 men (49.4%), aged 24 to 93 years (Mean (M) = 68.26 years; Standard Deviation (SD) = 14.19 years), with dialysis vintage ranging from 1 month to 33 years (M = 70.63 months; SD = 75.26 months). Among study patients, 70.6% declared that depression was the cause of their poor well-being, 75.3% attributed their depressive symptoms to kidney failure, and 49.4%, more specifically, to hemodialysis. A total of 64.7% of patients had a low perception of self-influence on the course of their kidney disease, and 58.5% presented a coping style focused on emotions. The most frequent dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs were negative beliefs about not controlling one's own thoughts. This attitude was related to the low perception of self-influence on the course of the disease, maladaptive coping styles, and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs.

Cholecalciferol vs. Small Doses of Alfacalcidol vs. Placebo in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Parallel Group Study.

BACKGROUND: The ability of extrarenal tissues to convert 25(OH)D (calcidiol) into 1,25(OH)2D (calcitriol) and dependence of the conversion on substrate levels provide the rationale for supplementing vitamin D in dialysis patients who usually have severe depletion of both: 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D. The primary aim of the study was to compare effects of small doses of cholecalciferol (12,000 IU/week) with frequently used in Europe, small doses of alfacalcidol (1.5 µg/week) or placebo, given for 12 weeks, on serum 1,25(OH)2D in hemodialysis patients with 25(OH)D deficiency. Secondary outcomes were changes in serum calcium, phosphate, 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and sclerostin during the treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, partly double-blind (cholecalciferol vs. placebo) study. Out of 522 patients dialyzed in 5 centers in the Mazovian Province, 93 gave informed consent and met the inclusion criteria: any vitamin D metabolites and calcimimetics naïve; no history of liver or intestinal disease; serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml, iPTH <1,000 ->110 pg/ml, calcium <10.2, and phosphate <6.8 mg/dl. The subjects were stratified by serum iPTH, then randomized into 3 groups according to the treatment. RESULTS: To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing head-to-head these drugs in the hemodialysis population. There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline. 81 patients completed the study. Cholecalciferol normalized serum 25(OH)D, with a mean rise from 12.9 ± 6.7 to 31.3 ± 10.1 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). This was accompanied by a marked increase of 1,25(OH)2D from 13.8 ± 9.3 to 25.1 ± 14.2 pmol/l (p < 0.0001). A rise in serum 1,25(OH)2D was also observed in alfacalcidol treated patients, however much smaller (from 13.5 ± 10.1 to 18.5 ± 11.0 pmol/l; p = 0.02). Neither cholecalciferol nor alfacalcidol treatment resulted in significant changes in serum PTH and the remaining parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, treatment with cholecalciferol in a 12,000 IU/week dose permits safe correction of 25(OH)D deficiency and is more effective than 1.5 µg/week dose of alfacalcidol in rising serum 1,25(OH)2D. This, together with a lack of influence on circulating iPTH the usefulness of such small alfacalcidol doses in hemodialysis patients is debatable.

HOME DIALYSIS DURING COVID-19 OUTBREAK - IT IS WORTH TO CONSIDER.

The epidemic with the new SARS-CoV-2 virus poses a serious threat to patients treated with renal replacement therapy. Besides clinical risk factors (such as numerous comorbidities, immune disorders), dialysis patients are additionally exposed to the virus through regular stays for several hours in a dialysis center and ambulance journeys. In such an epidemiological situation, it seems that peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis are good alternatives for treatment. Currently available telemedicine and medical technologies allow for effective renal replacement therapy also outside dialysis centers. Thanks to this, it is possible to limit the stay of patients in a medical facility to clinically justified situations. For this reason, increasing the number of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis, which is carried out at home and without contact with medical personnel, seems to be a good solution. Enabling patients to undergo home hemodialysis treatment, nowadays unavailable in Poland and establishing it as a guaranteed benefit in the health care system will enable renal replacement therapy to be adapted to the clinical condition and the need for isolation.

Medical waste management - how industry can help us to protect environment and money?

Background: The global climate change and its consequences force us to remodel our processes and rethink the current model of providing the HD treatments. Waste management have a massive impact on the environment and the economy. Every HD session produces above 1 kg of medical waste, which should be properly stored and destroyed. In particular in the pandemia time we should improve the dialysis unit budget as well as decrease CO2 emission produced during the waste elimination.Materials and Methods: The checked the weight of different dialyzers used regularly in dialysis centers in Poland. The Kern CM 320-IN scale was used for the measurement. The measurement accuracy was 0.1 g. Also the filling volume of each dialyzer has been taken into consideration.Results: The dialyzers were divided into four groups depending on the surface. 1,4m2 in group one, 1.5-1.6 m2 in group two, 1.7-1.8 m2 in group three and finally 2.0-2.2 m2 in group four. FX class dialyzers were lightest in every group. The heaviest ones were Polyflux dialyzers. The difference between the lightest and heaviest dialyzers was about 95 g. The filling volume was lowest in FX dialyzers and the highest in Elisio dialyzers. The difference was 20 mL.Conclusions: The weight of different dialyzers available on the market differs. The decision-makers should take into account this fact as the additional quality feature. In extreme cases the weight difference reaches 95 g. In yearly perspective, the usage of the lighter dialysis set can cause the 17 million kg decrease of medical waste and significant savings.

Intraoperative Dialysis During Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) is a technically complex surgical procedure associated with a major risk of hemodynamic instability and metabolic derangement, especially in patients with coexisting renal dysfunction. Some centers have applied intraoperative renal replacement therapy (ioRRT) to support patients with preoperative renal failure and prevent critical complications. Although there is a strong theoretical rationale for this treatment, there remains a paucity of definite data demonstrating its benefits. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all adult patients undergoing intraoperative dialysis in our center from January 2010 till December 2016. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 88 patients with a mean MELD score of 31.4. Six patients underwent simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. Forty-four (50%) recipients were admitted to the intensive care unit before transplantation, and 19 (21.6%) needed mechanical ventilation. Twenty-eight (31.8%) of the procedures were retransplantations, and 40 (45.4%) patients had been undergoing renal replacement therapy before LT. The mean preoperative serum creatinine was 2.82 ± 1.13 mg/dL. The majority of patients (54.5%) was operated on using the veno-venous bypass technique. The mean arterial blood pH and potassium levels after reperfusion were 7.2 ± 0.12 and 4.04 ± 0.95 mmol/L, respectively. Postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) occurred in 11 (13.9%) patients in whom dialysis started at least 15 minutes before reperfusion. Dialysis circuit clotting occurred in 9.1% of cases. There were no other adverse events of ioRRT. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that intraoperative dialysis in severely ill patients with a high MELD score is safe and effective. Lower than expected PRS occurrence needs to be confirmed in a study with a control group.